Recent content by Dave Pitman

If you have a version 1 based upon the standard controller having the orange parts, and they sold you a version 2 smart controller stating it was for a version 1. Then it is their mistake. Send it back for the correct version or a refund. V1 smart controllers do come up for sale from time to...

Orange hinges on the standard remote is a V1, black hinges is V2. On the smart controller, orange showing in the vent is V2 and black is V1.

I don't know exactly how the parameters are used by processing software. But, I think that their use increases the ability of the software to properly determine the position of the camera when it took the image. And therefore, helps the software to arrive at a good camera calibration to apply to...

Emlid Studio is a work in progress and is not yet the best tool for PPK drone work. Pick up a copy of RedToolbox. It is more mature, and is designed for drone use.

I've kept our v.2 ent. rtk because it does work, and it is a hedge against DJI's geofencing. It's been a couple of years, but I have been bitten by DJI's geofence database that incorrectly had a private airport near a project. Autel has been such a disappointment. They had the correct pieces...

Autel has abandoned support in short order for every craft they have manufactured all the way up to the Dragon fish. Autel will probably be around for years. But the hope that they would be a meaningful alternative to DJI has been decimated by Autel leadership. Too bad.

No problem. And, the process was called "binding" before DJI was a company!! 🤔 :cool:

Just a FYI, It's called "binding" the controller to the aircraft. This was done long before the bluetooth or wifi protocols existed. :) It's not a big deal, but may as well use the correct terminology, right!

Unfortunately, the RS+ is a single frequency transceiver a the Evo RTK uses a dual freq. They are not compatible. You need a dual freq. gnss like the RS2+. The Evo receives RTK corrections over NTRIP. The RS2+ can act as a base and send corrections to the Evo over NTRIP when all of the...

I don't think the Boson version 640 was radiometric. According to the Flir site, the Boson sensor itself won't be radiometric until the 4th quarter, 2023 at the earliest.

$1100 for the camera is a good deal. However, there are a bunch of brand-new kits that include the craft, multiple batteries, and the camera in the $4k and under range. Before Autel fell ( I mean, threw themselves :rolleyes: ) on their sword, the 640T camera was $5700 by itself.

They used to. Autel kind of killed their own market. That doesn't minimize the fact that if you are happy, then it's a great value! Nothing wrong with the T either. You have to use a workaround if you want to use Flir tools, but the image quality itself is even a little better than the R.

My v.2 ent. outputs 2 files for PPK: 101FTASK_Rinex.obs 101FTASK_Timestamp.mrk The .obs file contains raw gnss logging in rinex format and the .mrk file is the camera positions in gps time. There is no navigation file. But, the navigation file from the base, either CORS or local, is all you...

Bummer, man. :(

In your screenshots, you are not using NTRIP corrections by virtue of the "SINGLE" condition. You may as well turn RTK to the off position and take off as normal. You need a "FIX" condition for RTK to operate. Scroll down just below what you posted and you will see the condition of the...